Showing posts with label healthcare insights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label healthcare insights. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

The Medicare Congress Podcast: John Gorman of Gorman Health Group on Medicare Reform

With health care reform, health plans are experiencing turbulent times with fierce competition and the hardest challenges ever faced. During this critical time, planning is everything. Will your health plan be able to survive the storm?

Listen to the 8th Annual Medicare Congress pre-event podcast with keynote speaker John Gorman, CEO, GORMAN HEALTH GROUP, discusses important managed care insights including:
• Mastering your risk adjustment
• Surviving the regulations blizzard
• Rethinking your compliance with performance management
• Creating a “Star Czar” Star-rating management for achieving performance-based bonuses
• Holding on to current members and retain new ones in shorter enrollment periods
• Managing chronic illness effectively
• Identifying opportunities to Medicare Part D
• Building an intervention model to improve your medical management

Download the podcast here:
http://bit.ly/9CRzdi

Visit the webpage to download the agenda and find out more about the 2011 Medicare Congress Agenda to learn more about Gorman's keynote address “How do Health Plans do more with Less?:
http://bit.ly/b0u84i





Thursday, October 1, 2009

States Report Sharp Increase in Medicaid Enrollment and Spending Amid Worst Recession in Decades

The Kaiser Family Foundation reports that the number of people on Medicaid and state spending on the program are climbing sharply as a result of the recession, straining state budgets and pressuring officials to curb costs despite increased financial help from the federal government, according to a survey released today by the Kaiser Family Foundation’s Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured.

The annual 50-state survey of state Medicaid officials finds that these trends are expected to continue well into the 2010 fiscal year, with the slumping economy contributing to the loss of jobs, private health coverage and state tax revenue at a time when more people are seeking help from public programs.

Across the country, states estimate Medicaid enrollment grew by an average of 5.4 percent in state fiscal 2009, the highest rate in six years, surpassing the projected 3.6 percent increase at the start of the year. Similarly, total Medicaid spending growth averaged 7.9 percent in FY 2009, the highest rate in five years, well above the 5.8 percent projected growth. For FY 2010, states estimate Medicaid enrollment will grow by 6.6 percent over FY 2009 levels.

The survey finds that, based on initial legislative appropriations, Medicaid spending across states is expected to grow by an average of at least 6.3 percent in fiscal 2010. But officials in three-fourths of the states are concerned that those appropriations will not be enough, leading to more budget shortfalls and more pressures to trim services and spending.

“The recession has shown the importance of Medicaid as a safety net for millions of Americans who have lost health coverage when they have lost their jobs,” said Diane Rowland, executive vice president of the Kaiser Family Foundation and executive director of the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured. “But it also has shown the challenges for states of maintaining coverage when state revenues drop during times of economic crisis.”

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Provides Some Fiscal Relief

The fiscal picture would have been much worse if not for the availability of increased federal Medicaid funding through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA).

The federal money, which will provide an estimated $87 billion to states through enhanced federal matching funds through December 31, 2010, helped all states, many of which are facing significant state budget shortfalls. States used the funds to address overall budget and Medicaid budget shortfalls, avoid cuts to providers, benefits and eligibility and address the recession-driven growth in enrollment.

ARRA also helped protect Medicaid eligibility. In order to qualify for the money, states had to ensure that their Medicaid eligibility standards, methodologies and procedures were no more restrictive than they had been on July 1, 2008, seven months before the enactment of the stimulus law. That requirement prompted 14 states to reverse new eligibility restrictions and five states to abandon planned new restrictions.

Nearly Every State Implemented Measures To Control Medicaid Spending

Even with federal relief, nearly every state implemented at least one new Medicaid policy to control spending in fiscal 2009 and 2010, the survey finds.

More than any other policy area, provider payment rate changes serve as a barometer of state fiscal conditions. Thirty-three states cut or froze provider rates in fiscal 2009, well above the 22 that had been expected to do so. Even more states (39) are slated to cut or freeze rates for FY 2010. And several others are considering it.

Rate cuts can jeopardize provider participation and inhibit Medicaid enrollees’ access to needed care. They bite particularly hard because some states have not fully restored provider rates to levels seen before the round of cuts in the last economic downturn from 2001 to 2004.

Several states also cut covered benefits or imposed new utilization controls for existing benefits, most commonly targeting dental and vision services for adults. Ten states reported benefits restrictions for fiscal 2009 and 15 reported them for fiscal 2010. California, Michigan and Utah instituted multiple benefit cuts.

Pressures Illustrate Challenges And Opportunities For Medicaid As A Cornerstone Of Health Reform

The reliance on Medicaid during times of economic crisis, and the fiscal pressures that follow, spotlight both the challenges and opportunities for the program in health reform efforts. Several legislative proposals in Congress include measures that would expand Medicaid to cover more low-income people as a platform for larger reform.

Because many states have already used Medicaid as a vehicle to expand health coverage, Medicaid officials expressed general support for an expanded role for the program in health reform. Even in these tight fiscal times over half of the states in FY 2009 and FY 2010 are moving forward with efforts to improve eligibility standards or the streamline application processes in a bid to cover more people. Among the states implementing the broadest reforms and eligibility expansions are Colorado, Maryland, New York, Oklahoma and Wisconsin.
However, state Medicaid officials did register concerns about health reform, too, reflecting current state budget situations. Three-quarters of states expressed concern that Medicaid eligibility expansions, mandated minimum provider rates and new administrative costs – depending on how they were financed -- could add to state fiscal woes.

States Report Sharp Increase in Medicaid Enrollment and Spending Amid Worst Recession in Decades


Today's blog post was sponsored by The Medicaid Drug Rebate Program Summit

Event: http://bit.ly/BuykF
Brochure:http://bit.ly/iG6TT
Register: http://bit.ly/KnBae





Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Most Americans are Willing to Fund Healthcare Reform that Works

A recent telephone survey poll conducted by Thomas Reuters found in this post on Reuters highlights that there is an underlying strong belief that Americans are entitled to the best healthcare, but there is skepticism that the government can deliver that. According to the survey, 63% are willing to pay for healthcare reform, but only 35% believe that Obama's reform agenda will lead to better service, and 41% believe that it will lower costs.

The survey shows that most Americans are ready to pay extra taxes to ensure that the country receives the best healthcare possible. What's your take on it?




Friday, September 25, 2009

Mandate minus price controls may increase healthcare costs

The Los Angeles Times reports that many experts believe an insurance mandate is vital to a healthcare overhaul. With everyone in the system, the nation's medical bill could be spread more broadly, alleviating pressure on those who have insurance to pay for those who don't. All of the major healthcare bills would penalize people who do not get health insurance.But Democrats have shied away from regulating premiums in the face of charges from business leaders and Republicans that controlling what insurers charge would be meddling too much in the private sector. As a result, while states have long supervised what companies charge for mandated automobile and homeowners insurance, the idea has been largely banished from the healthcare debate.

What do you think about the lack of price controls within the healthcare bill? Will this have a negative effect on healthcare costs for Americans? We'd like to hear your thoughts.

Mandate minus price controls may increase healthcare costs




Tuesday, September 1, 2009

Funding Recommendations for President Obama's Health Care Reform

More and more people are beginning to disapprove of Obama's health care reform as time goes by. Les Leopold detailed in this recent article in The Huffington Post a couple of things President Barack Obama could do to gain back the trust of the public with his health care reform. Les mentioned that Obama has yet tapped into the wealthy in order to fund the health care reform, even though Wall Street has received a bail out. Here are some things Les believes the president should consider:


1. Increases taxes on those who have adjustable gross incomes of over $1 million a year.
By collecting an extra 10 percent surcharge for health care from these wealthy returns we can collect an extra $140 billion per year.
2. Place a 90 percent windfall tax on Wall Street profits and bonuses.
If executives are able to still collect bonuses from banks that we own, then the majority should be taxed back to us. It is only fair.
3. Install a very small tax on each and every financial transaction on Wall Street.
A fee on Wall Street transactions would generate nearly $50 billion a year.

Do you agree with Les Leopold's recommendations?




Thursday, August 20, 2009

Healthcare Co-Ops-- a Real Alternative?

The LATimes reports that congressional Democrats and Republicans are already sparring over an alternative to government-run insurance -- a series of private regional cooperatives that advocates say could achieve the goals of a public plan without the potential for government interference.

One of the six -- Democrat Kent Conrad of North Dakota -- is the leading Senate proponent of co-ops. He and others point to cooperatives in Seattle and Minnesota that employ doctors and own their own healthcare facilities, giving them more control over costs and the quality of care. Conrad says that under his plan, the federal government would play no role in managing the co-ops, but would only provide seed money to help them get started.

It seems that under this plan, some could choose their healthcare just like they choose a new apartment. But what about regulation of fees and fights over which doctors to choose for their co-op?

Healthcare co-ops emerging as viable alternative




Thursday, June 11, 2009

Obama's Healthcare Plan Making Headway

After months of discussions between Congress, Obama has stated that "It's time to deliver," according to this post on CBS News. A lot of legislation is being drafted now, including this one which would require every American, except for those who cannot afford it, to obtain health insurance. Obama's public plan has received a lot of criticism from Congress, what are your thoughts? Read the full article here.

Take a look at the video below to see White House Senior Advisory Davis Axelrod speak with Harry Smith about Pres. Obama`s stance on health care reform.




Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Panel Established for Global Healthcare

Reported today in The Boston Globe, a senior level committee has been give $10B to establish a plan for global health care. According to the article, the bipartisan Commission on Smart Global Health Policy, whose members include Senators Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire and Olympia Snowe of Maine, was given a mandate yesterday to identify a more comprehensive strategy for spending the estimated $10 billion dedicated each year to assisting the most disease-plagued nations.
Retired Navy Admiral William J. Fallon is heading up the initatitive and the group plans to show their ideas early next year to President Obama. The commission's 26 members include several members of Congress; former top diplomats and intelligence officials such as John Negroponte; leaders of nonprofits such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; former Health and Human Services Secretary Donna Shalala; the president of Barnard College; and executives from major corporations such as Exxon Mobil, Coca Cola, and drug giant Merck and Co.