Speakers:
David Iuliani – sanofi-aventis
Edward McAdam – Daiichi Sankyo
Jay McKinley - Cephalon
Put your data into your system in a way where you are thinking about how you want that detail back out. Looking at it another way; with the new Managed Medicaid units coming through from the states your set-up of your systems is vital to getting the output of the detail correctly.
Manufacturers have begun to see all types of invoices coming in for payment. Some states have done different invoices per plan, while others are submitting two invoices (one as Medicaid and one as Managed Medicaid), and still another state has indicated that their invoices will be rolled-up into one.
The different types of invoicing poses a problem in how you set up your system. Do you put all of the invoices into your system as one from each state, or do you set up your system to have different invoices that pull into one check request? And if you have different invoices that get connected together within the system will your finance department cut one check for all invoices or will your systems relay the information that these linked accounts should be paid as separate checks. And if the state is segregating all plans to have each on a separate invoice will you be required to make check requests and cut a check for each?
At this point it appears that the states are still trying to feel their way through this and working on the Managed side of the business to pull the information they need to invoice you. Until all states have sent their new Medicaid/Managed Medicaid invoices, your best bet is to be prepared for all scenarios and think through your potential process changes now.
Not to add to your plate, but I will… also think about the fact that the state of Arizona (which many of us have not had to address each quarter) has always been Managed Medicaid. How is that going to affect your systems? And think about how you will handle the double dip (which are allowed across Medicaid and Managed Medicaid) units when you dispute on one side. Do you have to dispute on both sides and will the disputes be concurrent instead of one side having to be a historical dispute?
Happy Processing!
About Us
Health Care Insights - From Policy to Practice is the trusted source for news and commentary from the nation's leading Health Care Events such as Medicaid Drug Rebate Program Summit (MDRP), Medicaid Managed Care Congress (MMCC), FDA/CMS to inform Health Plans and Pharmaceutical Manufacturers on the latest developments on Medicare, Medicaid Managed Care, Government Programs, and Health Insurance Exchanges.
Topics we cover include reform, best business practices, the latest innovations, and novel payment models.
Subscribe
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(111)
-
▼
September
(23)
- GP Jeopardy at IIR!
- MDRP 2010 Conference - Minimizing Revenue Leakage ...
- MDRP 2010 Conference - Best Practices in Bundling ...
- MDRP 2010 Conference - New Strategies and Opportun...
- MDRP 2010 Conference - Enforcement of the Federal ...
- MDRP 2010 Conference - 340B Pricing Structure and ...
- MDRP 2010 Conference - Successful Rebate Processin...
- MDRP 2010 Conference - Government Pricing Program ...
- MDRP 2010 Conference - Navigating the Operational ...
- MDRP 2010 Conference - State Price Reporting Laws ...
- MDRP 2010 Conference - Current CMS Rebate Data, Op...
- MDRP 2010 Conference - Translating the GP Impact o...
- MDRP 2010 Conference - Translating the Impact of H...
- MDRP 2010 Conference - Reforming Medicaid: Coverin...
- MDRP 2010 Conference - Operational and System Answers
- MDRP 2010 Conference - Estimating and Operationizi...
- MDRP 2010 Conference - Operational Process for the...
- MDRP 2010 Conference - Quantifying the Impact of t...
- MDRP 2010 Conference - Continuing Challenges from ...
- MDRP 2010 Conference - AMP after HCR: Implementati...
- 8th Annual Medicare Congress Brochure Ready for Do...
- Model health care sites opening across the nation
- Are you concerned about the influx of Medicaid Man...
-
▼
September
(23)
No comments:
Post a Comment